Recording consent by jurisdiction
One-party consent
Kentucky is a one-party consent jurisdiction: a participant in the conversation may record it without telling the others.
Our reading, not verified text. Everything in this section is editorial judgment about how the statute works. Unlike the statute above, the reading itself has not been checked against a source.
Kentucky's eavesdropping definition at KRS 526.010 turns on recording 'without the consent of a party', so a participant may record. The chapter is criminal; there is no separate civil consent statute.
Statute: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 526.010
Read from: Kentucky Legislative Research Commission (apps.legislature.ky.gov) — serves a PDF — the government's own copy
Last verified: 2026-09-21 (today)
Status: Verified against the government source
Federal law permits recording with one party's consent unless the recording is made to commit a crime or tort. Federal law is the FLOOR; a state may and many do require more. Where an interstate call touches two states with different rules, the safe assumption is the stricter one. See 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d).
Reference information, not legal advice. Statutes change and courts read them differently; confirm the current text with the linked primary source and counsel licensed in the jurisdiction before relying on it.
"Kentucky recording consent law", The Insurance Investigator's Playbook, https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/recording-consent/KY
Reuse with attribution and a link. Not licensed for AI model training — see terms.
All jurisdictions · This page as JSON · How this is verified · Terms of reuse
Found an error, or a statute that has moved? Tell us — a citation with the correction gets it into the next revision.