{
  "attribution": "The Insurance Investigator's Playbook — theclaimsplaybook.net",
  "jurisdiction": "NV",
  "name": "Nevada",
  "question": "Does recording a conversation in Nevada require one party's consent or all parties' consent?",
  "rule": "mixed",
  "ruleLabel": "It depends",
  "commonlyClassifiedAs": "all-party (two-party) consent",
  "commonLabelIsMisleading": true,
  "summary": "Nevada does not resolve to a single rule — the answer depends on the medium or on who is recording. Read the nuance and the statute before acting.",
  "nuance": "Nevada splits by medium, and the telephone rule is the trap. In-person recording under NRS 200.650 is one-party. But NRS 200.620 joins its two exceptions with 'and', and in Lane v. Allstate, 114 Nev. 1176 (1998), the Nevada Supreme Court read that conjunctively: a party may NOT record a telephone call without every party's consent. Phone calls are effectively all-party; in-person conversations are not.",
  "nuanceIsEditorial": true,
  "nuanceVerified": false,
  "casesCited": [
    {
      "name": "Lane v. Allstate",
      "verdict": "verified",
      "citation": "114 Nev. 1176",
      "allCitations": [
        "969 P.2d 938",
        "114 Nev. 1176",
        "14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1134",
        "1998 Nev. LEXIS 139"
      ],
      "court": "Nevada Supreme Court",
      "year": 1998,
      "url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1405143/lane-v-allstate-insurance/",
      "holdingVerified": false
    }
  ],
  "caseLawVerified": true,
  "caseHoldingsVerified": false,
  "caseLawNote": "Each decision named in `nuance` was checked against a court record on CourtListener: it exists and carries the citation given. What the decision is said to HOLD is our reading and has not been verified.",
  "statute": "Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.620, 200.650",
  "federalFloor": {
    "statute": "18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d)",
    "rule": "one-party",
    "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511",
    "note": "Federal law permits recording with one party's consent unless the recording is made to commit a crime or tort. Federal law is the FLOOR; a state may and many do require more. Where an interstate call touches two states with different rules, the safe assumption is the stricter one."
  },
  "verification": {
    "status": "verified",
    "statusLabel": "Verified against the government source",
    "verifiedOn": "2026-09-21",
    "sourceUrl": "https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-200.html",
    "sourcePublisher": "Nevada Legislature (Legislative Counsel Bureau) - official state government",
    "sourceTier": "government",
    "canDetectChange": true,
    "recheckCadence": "weekly",
    "consideredStaleAfter": "90 days",
    "methodUrl": "https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/method"
  },
  "disclaimer": "Reference information, not legal advice. Statutes change and courts read them differently; confirm the current text with the linked primary source and counsel licensed in the jurisdiction before relying on it.",
  "citation": {
    "permalink": "https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/recording-consent/NV",
    "title": "Nevada recording consent law",
    "publisher": "The Insurance Investigator's Playbook",
    "methodUrl": "https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/method",
    "termsUrl": "https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/terms",
    "attributionRequired": true,
    "aiTrainingPermitted": false,
    "aiSearchPermitted": true,
    "citationText": "\"Nevada recording consent law\", The Insurance Investigator's Playbook, https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/recording-consent/NV",
    "citationMarkdown": "[Nevada recording consent law](https://theclaimsplaybook.net/law/recording-consent/NV) — The Insurance Investigator's Playbook"
  }
}